When Not To Use Agile: 5 Signs You Need a Different Approach Aasim Naseem, April 25, 2025 | Read Count: 494June 3, 2025 Category: Project Management > Agile & Frameworks Agile is a first choice by default in project management, especially for software development projects. But it is not a one-size-fits-all solution. In fact, forcing Agile into the wrong environment can do more harm than good. If you’ve ever felt like your team is going in circles with stand-ups or sprints, but nothing is delivered as a “usable and potentially shippable component,” chances are #Agile may not be the best fit for that particular project. So, when not to use Agile? Let’s break it down. 1. When Requirements Are Fully Known and Fixed Agile works in uncertainty—but if your project has solid requirements that won’t change, like regulatory or compliance-heavy projects, Agile might add unnecessary overhead. In such a situation, a traditional waterfall or hybrid model that benefits from upfront planning and clear documentation. This is the finest case of when not to use Agile. 2. When Teams Lack Agile Experience or Buy-in Agile is more than a framework—it’s a mindset. If your team isn’t trained or doesn’t believe in Agile values, the ceremonies will feel forced, and productivity will suffer. Here, begin with structured training or pilot Agile in small areas before going all in. Learn more about Agile Frameworks Agile vs Scrum: Finally Understanding the Difference 8 Ways to Run an Effective Daily Stand-Up in Agile Projects (Without Wasting Everyone’s Time) 5 Kanban Mistakes You’re Probably Making (and How to Fix Them Fast) 7 Ways of Managing Over-Demanding Clients in Software Projects 5 Shifts to Have Scrum Mindset Instead of Stand-ups and Sprints 3. When Strict Deadlines and Budgets Are Non-Negotiable Agile is iterative and embraces change—but that flexibility can be a downside in projects with rigid timelines or fixed scopes. Instead, consider a predictive model that emphasizes upfront planning, cost estimation, and fixed deliverables. This is a case when not to use Agile. 4. When Client Involvement Is Minimal or Unavailable Agile needs continuous feedback. If your stakeholders aren’t available to collaborate regularly, you’ll struggle to keep development aligned with expectations. So, what to do in this case? Use more structured communication cycles or consider project approaches that require less ongoing input. In this case, when not to use Agile. 5. When You’re Building Hardware, Infrastructure, or Physical Products Agile shines in software, but when it comes to physical construction or infrastructure—where iteration is expensive—traditional models often work better. For such projects, use Agile selectively, like during the design phase, then switch to sequential execution for build phases. This is another case when not to use Agile. Final Thoughts: It’s Not About Agile vs. Waterfall —It’s About Fit Agile isn’t bad. But using Agile when it doesn’t fit can create problems for the team, project, and/or for the organization. Always remember that project management isn’t a religion that can’t be changed. The best approach is to pick the right tool and methodology for the job. Author Profile Aasim Naseem Hey, Thanks for your interest. I’m a PMP, AWS Solutions Architect, and Scrum Master certified professional with 17+ years of hands-on experience leading projects, building teams, and helping organizations deliver software solutions better, faster, and smarter. Outside of work, I’ve got a deep curiosity for history — especially ancient civilizations like Egypt. I also enjoy reflecting on the everyday moments that shape how we live and work. This blog is my space to share insights, lessons, and thoughts from both my professional journey and personal interests. Thanks for reading — and I hope you will find something here that matches your interest. Latest entries IslamJune 6, 2025 | Read Count: 283Economic impact of Eid-ul-Adha PMP CertificationMay 23, 2025 | Read Count: 493Best PMP Study Resources for 2025 (Books, Courses, Tools & More) Agile & FrameworksMay 7, 2025 | Read Count: 463Agile vs Scrum: Finally Understanding the Difference Agile & FrameworksApril 25, 2025 | Read Count: 494When Not To Use Agile: 5 Signs You Need a Different Approach Agile & Frameworks agile challengesagile drawbacksagile limitationsagile mythsagile vs traditionalproject management methodologieswhen agile failswhen agile is not suitablewhen waterfall is better
Agile & Frameworks 8 Ways to Run an Effective Daily Stand-Up in Agile Projects (Without Wasting Everyone’s Time) April 13, 2025 | Read Count: 451May 8, 2025 Category: Project Management > Agile & Frameworks The daily stand-up is a simple Agile ritual—but when done right, it becomes a powerful tool for team alignment and momentum. Yet too often, teams fall into bad habits: long updates, problem-solving debates, or stand-ups that feel pointless. Let’s fix that. Here are… Read More
Agile & Frameworks 5 Kanban Mistakes You’re Probably Making (and How to Fix Them Fast) April 10, 2025 | Read Count: 415 Category: Project Management > Agile & Frameworks Kanban seems simple — move cards from “To Do” to “Done,” right? But under the surface, this visual workflow tool demands clarity, consistency, and discipline. If you’re using Kanban and still feeling chaos, chances are you’re falling into one (or more) of these… Read More
Agile & Frameworks 5 Shifts to Have Scrum Mindset Instead of Stand-ups and Sprints April 11, 2024 | Read Count: 1,424May 27, 2025 Category: Project Management > Agile & Frameworks Let’s get something straight: Scrum is not just about daily stand-ups and time-boxed sprints. You have to have a Scrum mindset to drive it effectively. Like we discussed about mistakes about Kanban, there is a serious misunderstanding about Scrum as well. If your… Read More
Event when requirements are completely known, can’t we divide them in sat of deliverables, shipped in sprints for feedback? Reply
We can, but this rule applies when requirements are crystal clear, discussed, aligned, signed, and sealed. No more discussion or feedback is needed. The delivery team is now responsible for shipping the 100% that had been aligned and signed. In such a situation, waterfall can be used to analyze, design, and develop whole requirements. There will be only one delivery, with complete scope covered. No iteration and feedback loop that may add new requirements. Reply
Highly depends on whether you can break your deliverable into usable components against after sprint. For example, in a construction project (like a flyover), can we ship one lane of road and then start working on the other? Or we can ship only the base supporting columns and then move to building the actual carpet tracks. Always remember that the outcome of a sprint (a chunk of scope) should be usable by the end users. If it isn’t, this is not a good sprint planning. Reply